Posted at 09:59 PM in Advertising, Food, France | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In the early 20th century when Arrow had 94% of market share, much of their success could be laid with illustrator J.C. Leyendecker -- he used his chiseled boyfriend as the model for the archetypal Arrow Collar Man. Born in Germany in 1874, Leyendecker moved with his family to Chicago when he was eight. He and his brother enrolled at the city's Art Institute before studying art nouveau at the Académie Julian in Paris. They returned to Chicago early in 1899 and by May Leyendecker received his first commission for a cover of the era's most famous magazine, The Saturday Evening Post. Throughout his career he would draw 321 more covers for them, creating the genre of "adorable" domestic chaos, stirring patriotism, family holidays, lovers' foibles, and youthful high spirits (with scrawny nudity) that today we associate with his Eve Harrington protege and successor Norman Rockwell. Leyendecker was slight and disliked confrontation; when his friends warned him Rockwell was stealing his style, he didn't protest. (Being a gay man and an immigrant in the early 20th century may also have amplified his instincts to avoid trouble.) One area in which he maintained preeminence was the blatant homoerotic. Leyendecker's men eternally give one another penetrating looks inside, outdoors, and on deck, and they're always thrusting elongated objects at happy angles from their bodies. He never met a muscle that didn't need to beef up, ripple, or glisten under his expert touch. As his biographers
explain, “Neighboring artists shared models with the brothers, which meant a seemingly endless train of attractive Greenwich Village lads parading through their chilly studio in the buff.” One was named Charles Beach. He was 17 and Leyendecker was 28. By all accounts Beach was both hot and not, given to self aggrandizing claims that he did Leyendecker's work (despite not being able to draw), along with the more typical fits of jealousy, insecurity, and tyranny. Margo Channing Norman Rockwell complained he never heard Beach say anything intelligent and called him "stupid." Nevertheless, Leyendecker and Beach moved into a New Rochelle mansion together and threw luxe parties attended by the jazz age set including Scott and Zelda. Inevitably, times changed, the commissions dwindled, and the money ran out. They had to dismiss their staff yet they stayed together a total of 49 years, until Leyendecker's death in 1951 when he instructed his private papers be destroyed. For more, read J.C. Leyendecker.
Leyendecker's artist brother F.X. Leyendecker also had an eye for masculine muscle, as with this barechested blacksmith, and for strategically placed missiles between shirtless swabbies (compare below). He became addicted to drugs and killed himself at 47.
Posted at 10:10 AM in Advertising, Art, Birthdays | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
The Bakla Review, covering all things gay in the Philippines, has compiled two 10 Best of the Decade lists: movies and commercials. Given the shortcomings of indie international distribution, many of the films may be unknown to American viewers. The Blossoming of Maximo Oliveros, however, made a splash at New Directors / New Films, was nominated for a Spirit Award, and won the Berlinale Teddy for best feature. I was impressed by how naturally the movie develops the story of a 12 year boy in the slums developing an intense crush on the handsome young cop who saved him from an attack. Victor, the police officer whose private life is never revealed, rebuffs the boy's romantic advances, then corruption and violence flip their relationship and Maximo rejects Victor's friendship.
Readers who score low on attention span and high on immediate gratification will love Bakla's ten best Pinoy gay commercials, all of which can be seen on the site. They run the gamut from a gay couple casually holding hands walking down a crowded street to a lockerroom romp in which guys in towels lipsynch to Backstreet Boys. Some ads are played for humor to mixed results, though it's interesting to consider why ad executives thought it would sell more Sunkist Iced Tea to create a 30 second spot in which the thirsty basketball stud is shown to be a nellie queen turned on by rubbing against his sweaty teammates.
Posted at 08:40 AM in Advertising, Asia, Film, International | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Not being a television user, I had no idea Walt Whitman has become a jeans spokesperson. Yes, that's his rich voice reading "America." Everything that's wonderful about his delivery above is absent below in a didactic interpretation of "Pioneers! O Pioneers!" Nevertheless, a good day for bare chested gay poetry "...full of manly pride and friendship."
Posted at 05:15 AM in Advertising | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wayne Besen's nonprofit group Truth Wins Out, established to counter "ex-gay" and right wing propaganda, is placing this ad in the Salt Lake Tribune on Thursday. It's a response to the infamous anti-gay "No Mob Veto" ad by the Beckett group in last Friday's New York Times, and deserves much wider publicity and placement than TWO can afford. (It's a serious issue, so I'll refrain from posting my two ads "Lies in the Name of Lord of the Flies" and "Lies in the Name of The Lord Won't Mind.")
Posted at 09:40 AM in Activism, Advertising, Civil Unions - Marriage, Gay | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Last night at a private gallery in Chelsea, Annie Leibovitz gave a slideshow based on her new book, Annie Leibovitz at Work, and said, "Much as I love the set-up, I prefer to take moments on their own."
As for those iconic set-ups, Leibovitz usually offers three or four portrait concepts to her subjects but she also encourages them to suggest ideas. Cindy Sherman said, "I'd like to hide if I can," which sparked Leibovitz's group photo of ten women who look like Sherman. (One was an unknown actress, who surprised Leibovitz years later by saying, You've already shot me. Claire Danes.)
Originally Leibovitz didn't like her photo of a shirtless, cigar smoking Arnold on a white horse because it's "primarily about form" and she's "reluctant to have form dictate meaning" but then she realized, with Arnold, "form is meaning." She's been photographing him for more than thirty years, since his Pumping Iron days when he told her he felt he was destined for something more, because he was "always dreaming about dictators."
Of her naked Mark Morris photo in the style of Rousseau's Dream, she said, "I look at this picture now and think, 'Visually, I could fix this.'" At the last minute he decided he didn't want to show his penis. The weather was a particularly hot and he didn't think he was looking his best. Unrelated, at the last minute for what would become John Lennon's last photo shoot, Yoko Ono decided she didn't want to be naked after all, so only Lennon is bare. (Isn't it a much better picture for that?)
In the book, Leibovitz discusses her long delayed conversion to digital photography and the new possibilities of what can be tinkered with, altered, or faked. For her photo of Helen Mirren and Judi Dench together in the front seat of a car, the women were never together.
Of her tremendous output, Leibovitz said, "I feel like there are five pictures a year I like."
She will speak at the Union Square B&N on Thursday night, December 11. Highly recommended.
Posted at 07:14 AM in Advertising, Books, Fashion, Gay, Hollywood, Music, NYC, Photography | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
On the review compilation site Metacritic, Milk earned a perfect 100 score from The Chicago Sun-Times, The New York Times, The New York Post, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, The San Francisco Chronicle, Rolling Stone, TV Guide, Slate, and Time. It also has the most Oscar buzz. None of this would be happening if Milk had a happy ending. Hollywood has a long history of making movies and honoring films that can be summarized as gay = dead.
Somehow the few big budget movies that do show lgbt people, and those that are considered important each year, tend to fall in the category of Plea for Sympathy. "Gays shouldn't be killed" is a fairly low hurdle to clear, yet it's about as far as Hollywood is willing to go, and each time they do, they're cheered by robust self congratulations.
In the spirit of Vito Russo, look at which stories get told and rewarded, and which don't:
The Children's Hour (1961) lesbian suicide, five Oscar nominations
Silkwood (1983) (probably) bi woman murdered (for other reasons), five Oscar nominations, incl. bi and lesbian roles
The Times of Harvey Milk (1984) gay man murdered, won Best Documentary Oscar
Philadelphia (1994) gay man dies of aids, five Oscar nominations, two wins incl. gay role
As Good As It Gets (1997) gay man bashed, seven Oscar nominations, incl. gay role, two wins
Boys Don't Cry (1999) trans FTM murdered, two Oscar nominations, won Best Actress for FTM role
The Hours (2002) lesbian suicide but also open well adjusted lesbians, nine Oscar nominations incl. Best Actress win for suicide role
Monster (2003) killer lesbian executed, Best Actress Oscar
Brokeback Mountain (2005) gay man murdered, eight Oscar nominations, incl. two gay roles, three wins
Little Miss Sunshine (2006) gay man attempts suicide, four Oscar nominations, two wins
Milk (2008) gay suicide and gay man murdered, Oscar nominations to come
For whatever reason, the rare big studio movies in which the gay characters don't die are ignored by the Oscars, as are the many great indie queer movies that never reach the distribution they deserve. Other than The Hours, the best may be Gods and Monsters from 1998, which was nominated for three Oscars and won best adapted screenplay, and Far From Heaven (2002), which earned four nominations. Maurice, Velvet Goldmine, and Priscilla, Queen of the Desert were each nominated only for costumes; The Birdcage only for art direction; My Best Friend's Wedding only for music.
Transamerica was a great exception in 2005, nominated for two Oscars including the MTF role, but it's an open question whether it would have been so honored if the M had been played by an M rather than an F. That same year, Capote was nominated for five Oscars, but typically it was completely degayed. Truman's lover Jack Dunphy was reduced to something less than a roommate -- a concerned friend -- since they were never shown at home together.
Where are the major Hollywood movies showing healthy, unharmed contemporary same sex couples, and where are their Oscars? Why has The Front Runner languished in development for decades? Patricia Nell Warren says it's because it's set at the Olympics, but now the crowds can easily be CGI. For that matter, where is the biopic of Walt Whitman including his boyfriend Peter Doyle? Whitman's importance to American literature is approximately one thousand times greater than Harvey Milk's place in American politics.
Is it that filmmakers and screenwriters feel it's more important to show injustice against gay people, or are these the only stories studios will greenlight? Executives are certainly more comfortable with the storyline that goes "come out, die" and so is the religious right. The Family Research Council protested Kinsey but they, and Focus on the Family, and Concerned Women of America, all announced they wouldn't picket Brokeback Mountain.
For any Hollywood defenders who want to suggest that "drama is conflict," save your keystrokes. Conflict does not mean annihilation. In mainstream storytelling, an unhappy ending is considered more sophisticated because it is uncommon. Each year hundreds of very common movies conclude with a male and female couple united happily. Those that don't are exalted for subverting convention and playing against the audience's expectations. Obviously, gay stories do not unfold against a wealth of happy endings and viewers have been trained to expect misery.
As for Milk with a happy ending, that movie would be called Noble. Elaine Noble was elected to the Massachusetts State Legislature against all odds from a conservative Irish Catholic district, basically Dan White's people. And she did it three years before Harvey, though Milk ignores her accomplishment and touts him as the first openly gay man elected rather than first gay person. The plot of a scrappy woman triumphing over entrenched unfairness is a Hollywood favorite (Norma Rae, Erin Brokovich) but you won't see this one get made.
And if you haven't yet seen Milk, please pay attention to the scene when Harvey sees the ad designed to fight Prop 6. Not only could you substitute the ads against Prop 8, it's exactly the same as the print ads for Milk. He's outraged, and with good reason.
Posted at 09:25 AM in Advertising, de-gayed, Film, Gay, Gay History, Gay Movies, History, Hollywood, Jewish | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Focus Features ran their big announcement ad in yesterday's papers, the final Sunday before their best shot at an Oscar opens on Wednesday, and it hides any hint of the movie's gay content. Setting aside the problem of an ad campaign that forces the gay activist who insisted on gay visibility back into the closet after thirty years of progress, is it even good marketing? In all seriousness, if you didn't know Harvey Milk, what would you think this movie was about? Wisconsin dairy farmers? The milk lobby? Really bad haircuts? Compare this to the poster for Rob Espstein's documentary, which clearly shows a politician and the tagline says he's gay.
In a country where some people can't say on what date the events the of 9/11 occurred, let's not pretend "everyone knows" the history of a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1978. For that matter, let's also not pretend to be too surprised. As soon as Brokeback Mountain proved its crossover appeal, Focus yanked the iconic Heath-n-Jake white hat-black hat ads and replaced them with photos of the men and their wives. Hollywood always aims for the widest common denominator, erasing any sign of otherness. The one sheet for Dreamgirls showed three women in silhouette, with their backs to the camera and swathed in red stage light, so viewers wouldn't see they were black.
Posted at 04:59 AM in Activism, Advertising, de-gayed, Film, Gay, Gay Movies, History, Hollywood | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Sad day. Twelve years ago business journalist Michael Wilke started The Commercial Closet, showcasing lgbt images in advertising with an online database that now features more than 4,000 commercials. Seven years ago it became a 501c3 and the Commercial Closet Association began giving their annual Images in Advertising Awards. The awards honor the best portrayals of the lgbt community in tv spots, print ads, and billboards, while also challenging the worst advertisers to do better with the Clean Up Your Act Award.
Yesterday, the ten-person board of the Commercial Closet Association announced their planned merger with GLAAD and Wilke's departure from the company. Board president Anthony Cirone said, "Our work will become the basis of their advertising media program." Given the reigning ethos of the GLAAD Awards, look for the advertising program to become increasingly chummy with and forgiving of corporations, and to value celebrity access more than content.
Last year, Wilke gave a very smart interview to After Elton with this exchange:
Too lax to take offense. GLAAD signed off on Boat Trip. And I Now Pronounce You Chuk and Larry.
Posted at 05:40 AM in Advertising, Gay | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
You still have time to get tickets to the Commercial Closet's 4th Annual Images in Advertising Awards ceremony Monday night in New York. Among the nominees in ten categories, listed here, are Orbitz, D&G, Wrigley, Chemistry.com, and Levi's, whose spot is below. Nominees for best print ads include Macy's, Washington Mutual, and BMW. But why did the Commercial Closet discontinue their "Clean Up Your Act" anti-award, which this year would have seen stiff competition by homophobic ads from Snickers to Nike?
Posted at 07:49 PM in Advertising, Gay | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
God bless the British magazine Gay Times, which created these ads saying, "Homosexuality Has Been Legal For 40 Years. Enjoy." Yet officials from the London Underground banned one, and accepted the other. Can you tell the difference? (graphic from Techstickle.)
Posted at 10:52 AM in Advertising, Gay, U.K. | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted at 07:54 AM in Advertising, Photography | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In London earlier this morning, the Advertising Standards Authority announced 2006’s Ten Most Complained About Ads in the U.K. Three were gay related.
Coming in at number one, with 553 complaints, thanks to a church-sponsored campaign, was the Gay Police Association’s print ad (above) suggesting that anti-gay religious rhetoric inspires anti-gay attacks. The ASA upheld the complaints that the ad was offsensive and misleading.
Coming in at number six, with 127 complaints, was French Connection’s tv ad showing two women fighting—Fashion v. Style—in a martial arts competition then kissing each other. The ASA determined that the complaints were not justified. And, at number ten with 89 complaints, was a Dolce & Gabanna television spot that briefly showed two men kissing. Again the ASA ruled the complaints were unjustified. Both tv ads had been approved for broadcast only outside of prime time.
In the enduring spirit of There Will Always Be An England: The number one most complained about ad of 2005, with more than three times as many objections (1,671), was a television spot for KFC, which, according to the BBC, “featured people in a call centre singing with their mouths full.” The ASA ruled the complaints that this would teach children bad manners were not justified.
For comparison, after Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction with Justin Timberlake at the 2004 Super Bowl, the FCC received between 550,000 and 963,000 complaints, of which the FCC said 99.9% were brought by the Parents Television Council, an activist organization. Viacom paid $3.5 million in fines.
The U.K.'s Top 10 Most Complained About Ads of 2006
1. Gay Police Association, 553 complaints/ offensive, misleading/ upheld
2. HM Revenues and Customs, 271 complaints/ implies plumbers evade taxes/
not upheld
3. Dolce & Gabbana, 166 complaints/glamorises knife violence; socially irresponsible and offensive/ upheld
4. Motorola Ltd, 160 complaints/ mobile phone ads condoning knife-related violence and glamorising sexual violence/ not upheld
5. Carphone Warehouse, 145 complaints/ lack of clarity, potentially misleading statements on its claim to be '˜free forever'/ upheld
6. French Connection, 127 complaints/ women kissing/ not justified
7. Channel 5 Broadcasting, 99 complaints/ perceived as racist towards Americans and socially irresponsible in that it could incite racial violence/not upheld
8. Kellogg Company, 96 complaints/ portrayed cruelty to animals (man riding a dog) and would encourage viewers to try the same stunt at home. Kelloggs said the ad was clearly surreal in nature, no dog was actually ridden during filming and that the ad also featured a 'Don't try this with your dog at home' warning/ not upheld
9. National Federation of Cypriots, 93 complaints/ offensive to the Turkish community and likely to incite racial hatred/ upheld
10. Dolce & Gabbana, 89 complaints/ men kissing/ not upheld
Posted at 07:24 AM in Advertising | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)