Discussing his Booker-shortlisted "more personal and close to home" new work In a Strange Room at Three Lives last night, Damon Galgut admitted he and his editors debated whether to call it a memoir, travelogue, or fiction. Though all the events happened and "I haven't made anything up. I've been true to remembering," he's glad it's labeled a novel. Galgut twice said "memory is fiction." Describing the process of which details stay and which get filtered out, he said, "All of us all the time are constructing the narrative of our lives. That's what I'm doing in fiction."
He says the book's "deeper subject is memory itself" and that he "tried to embody the voice of memory in this book." This explains the shift between "he" and "I" in discussing himself in the more removed and more recent pasts.
No surprise to people who read any part of the book in the Paris Review or the PEN/O Henry Stories, he said "I am not a happy traveler." His "wanderings are fueled more by unhappiness," and are primarily "a desire to go away from where I am."
Yet although the book describes "bleak experiences" he thinks it's "consoling." He said, "There's something about language used well that is a consolation."
One of the reasons for this books marked changed in style compared to his previous work, like his other Booker-shortlisted novel The Good Doctor, is that he "felt I'd written all I had to say about South Africa." During the Q&A he voiced concern about the new government's proposed laws that might lead to censorship. Summing up a comparison with the old government, he said, "Different players, same game."
Galgut resisted a question about literary influences, saying that when he writes, "I try to clear other writers out of the mental attic." However, he was willing to name a few writers he admires: Greene, Beckett, Sebald, and Chekhov.
His own remarks, his interviewer's inquiries, and audience questions all avoided the gay content in his work. David Ebershoff was there and bought the book, so you'll be in great company when you get it.
Responding to a reader's quotation from the powerful, prize-winning middle section, "The Lover," Galgut agreed about its importance and said this passage "is the core of the book to me."
"Jerome, if I can't make you live in words, if you are only the dim evocation of a face under a fringe of hair, and the others too, Alice and Christian and Roderigo, if you are names without a nature, it's not because I don't remember, no, the opposite is true, you are remembered in me as an endless stirring and turning. But it's for this precisely that you must forgive me, because in every story of obsession there is only one character, only one plot. I am writing about myself alone, it's all I know, and for this reason I have always failed in every love, which is to say at the very heart of my life."
To contrast obsessions, you might read In a Strange Room back to back with Orhan Pamuk's The Museum of Innocence. For art as consolation, compare it with the closing epiphany of Jonathan Strong's new novel.